The Big Four’s AI Pivot: When the Consultants Who Sold Certainty Start Selling Speed

In partnership with

Salutations, Olio aficionados! 👋

Welcome to the 198th edition of Weekly Olio. We’re thrilled to introduce a fresh new twist to your Sundays: Publisher Parmesan, our hand-picked, thoughtfully crafted edition designed to spark inspiration and insights for the week ahead.

It’s the perfect way to unwind, recharge, and prepare for the week with something truly worth savoring.

If you’re new here and you’re looking for more long-form, crispy writing, click the link to subscribe under this GIF 👇

A word from our Sponsors…

It’s go-time for holiday campaigns

Roku Ads Manager makes it easy to extend your Q4 campaign to performance CTV.

You can:

• Easily launch self-serve CTV ads

• Repurpose your social content for TV

• Drive purchases directly on-screen with shoppable ads

• A/B test to discover your most effective offers

The holidays only come once a year. Get started now with a $500 ad credit when you spend your first $500 today with code: ROKUADS500. Terms apply.

Get started today.

The Big Four’s AI Pivot: When the Consultants Who Sold Certainty Start Selling Speed

It began, as corporate embarrassments often do, with a quiet correction and a partial refund.

Earlier this year, Deloitte was paid around USD 440,000 by the Australian government to produce an independent assurance report on the country’s welfare compliance system. When the final report came back, it didn’t just contain errors in judgment — it contained errors in reality.

Some citations pointed to papers that didn’t exist. A few footnotes led nowhere. One section quoted a court judgment that had never been written.

The culprit, as Deloitte later confirmed, was generative AI. The firm had used an AI tool to help draft parts of the document, and the model — in the neat language of bureaucrats — had introduced “factual inaccuracies.” Deloitte refunded part of the fee and quietly corrected the report.

For most companies, that would have been a moment to pause. Retrain staff. Tighten controls. Maybe even rethink the pace of AI adoption.

Not for Deloitte.

Within days of refunding the government, the firm announced its largest-ever technology rollout — a global deployment of Anthropic’s Claude, an AI chatbot now available to nearly half a million Deloitte employees. The timing was striking, almost defiant. As if the embarrassment had cleared the path for even more AI, not less.

And that’s what makes this moment remarkable. Because Deloitte isn’t just any company. It’s one of the world’s largest consulting firms — an institution whose entire business model rests on trust. The one you call to make sure you haven’t made a mistake.

Now, the guardians of corporate prudence are racing headlong into a technology that’s known to make things up.

Deloitte’s audacity captures a bigger shift reshaping the world of consulting.

The Big Four — Deloitte, PwC, EY, and KPMG — have spent a century selling judgment. They charged premiums for credibility, caution, and expertise. But in today’s consulting market, those are no longer differentiators. Everyone has process discipline. Everyone has compliance frameworks.

The new differentiator is speed — who can adopt, deploy, and sell AI faster.

PwC has struck a marquee deal with OpenAI and Microsoft, becoming one of OpenAI’s first enterprise resellers and one of the largest corporate users of Azure. EY has launched EY.AI, backed by over USD 1 billion in investment, to merge automation with advisory work. KPMG has gone all-in with Microsoft’s Azure AI, building an internal multi-agent automation system called Workbench.

And, of course, Deloitte has chosen Anthropic’s Claude.

Every firm now has a model partner, internal AI labs, “responsible AI” task forces, and glossy decks filled with phrases like augmented expertise, AI-driven transformation, and human-in-the-loop assurance.

But beneath all the jargon lies a simple truth: consulting is no longer just about advising companies that want to change. It’s about proving that you, the consultant, are already living that change.

Performance Over Proof

That’s where the irony deepens.

For decades, consulting firms prided themselves on being the adults in the room — the people who knew how to slow things down and apply structure to chaos. But today’s consulting culture rewards motion, not moderation.

Clients expect their advisors to not just understand AI, but to perform it. When a client is paying for “AI transformation,” they want to see their consultants using the very tools they’re selling.

So AI isn’t just a tool inside these firms anymore — it’s become a status marker. Internally, partners compete to sponsor pilot projects. Practice heads jostle to own the “AI center of excellence.” Across the industry, the choreography is nearly identical: billion-dollar investment plans, partnerships with model providers, and slogans about “responsible transformation.”

But the real race isn’t about who uses AI best. It’s about who looks like they use it best.

And that’s the quiet absurdity at the heart of the Big Four’s AI pivot. Firms that built their empires on credibility are now reorganizing themselves around a technology that hallucinates. The companies that sold certainty are now selling the illusion of certainty — just faster, sleeker, and automated.

The Flattening of AI Consulting

Ironically, the more loudly these firms trumpet their AI credentials, the more alike they start to sound.

Everyone uses the same large language models. Everyone relies on the same cloud providers. Everyone preaches the same “human oversight” narrative.

This sameness doesn’t soften competition — it intensifies it. Because once everyone is using similar tools, differentiation comes down to optics and governance.

Who can claim to be the most responsible? Who can prove that their AI is the most auditable, explainable, and traceable?

That’s where the next battle will be fought — not over who has the smartest algorithm, but over who can prove that their algorithm behaves.

You don’t have to stay stuck.

Stop doing it all. Start leading again. Access the next phase of growth with BELAY’s free resource, Delegate to Elevate.

Download BELAY’s Free eBook!

From Speed to Accountability

The global regulatory tide is already shifting in that direction. The European Union’s AI Act will soon require firms to disclose when they use generative AI in high-risk professional services. The UK and Australia are drafting similar rules for algorithmic accountability.

Government and financial-sector clients have started demanding audit trails:

• Which model generated this analysis?

• Who verified it?

• How was it stored, and for how long?

In other words, the differentiator of the next phase won’t be accuracy — it will be traceability.

That’s the irony that brings this story full circle. After a year of racing to automate judgment, the Big Four may soon find themselves returning to their roots: building audit trails, certifying compliance, and proving that their AI systems can be trusted.

A return, in a strange way, to the business of trust.

The Credibility Economy

Seen in that light, Deloitte’s Australian misstep wasn’t a derailment. It was a warning shot — and perhaps a preview of what’s to come.

Because in this new credibility economy, being wrong first might actually be safer than being right late. The public embarrassment becomes a proof point of engagement: “See, we’re learning in real time.”

The logic is brutal but effective. If every firm is racing to show it’s AI-ready, hesitation looks worse than a stumble.

But that’s also the danger. When everyone is chasing visibility, the risk is that the appearance of progress outruns the substance of it. And if the guardians of corporate judgment forget that distinction, they may discover the hard way that trust — once lost to automation — is far harder to rebuild than any algorithm.

After all, the consultants who built their legacy on certifying other people’s truth are now being asked to certify the truth of machines.

And that might turn out to be the most challenging audit they’ve ever had to perform.

The Gold standard for AI news

AI keeps coming up at work, but you still don't get it?

That's exactly why 1M+ professionals working at Google, Meta, and OpenAI read Superhuman AI daily.

Here's what you get:

• Daily AI news that matters for your career - Filtered from 1000s of sources so you know what affects your industry.

• Step-by-step tutorials you can use immediately - Real prompts and workflows that solve actual business problems.

• New AI tools tested and reviewed - We try everything to deliver tools that drive real results.

• All in just 3 minutes a day

Join 1M+ pros

Interested in learning more about AI? Check out our previous coverage here:

• The Global Race to Give AI a Body

• Google’s Last Stand? How India Became the Battleground in the AI War Against Microsoft?

• India’s AI Moment: Market, Lab, or Builder?

That’s all for this week. If you enjoyed this edition, we’d really appreciate if you shared it with a friend, family member or colleague.

We’ll be back in your inbox 2 PM IST next Sunday. Till then, have a productive week!

Peeyush and Mohit

Disclaimer: The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in the text belong solely to the author, and not necessarily to the author's employer, organization, committee or other group or individual.