India at the High Table — But Not Yet in the Top Tier

Salutations, Olio aficionados! 👋

Welcome to the 236th edition of Weekly Olio. We’re thrilled to introduce a fresh new twist to your Sundays: Publisher Parmesan, our hand-picked, thoughtfully crafted edition designed to spark inspiration and insights for the week ahead.

It’s the perfect way to unwind, recharge, and prepare for the week with something truly worth savoring.

If you’re new here and you’re looking for more long-form, crispy writing, click the link to subscribe under this GIF 👇

The DTC beauty category is crowded. To break through, Jennifer Anniston’s brand LolaVie, worked with Roku Ads Manager to easily set up, test, and optimize CTV ad creatives. The campaign helped drive a big lift in sales and customer growth, helping LolaVie break through in the crowded beauty category.

Learn more

For decades, India was described with a certain condescension. “Developing.” “Third world.” A democracy with potential, but little weight.That language has vanished.

With an economy just under $4 trillion and growth holding at 6 to 7 percent annually, India is no longer merely a middle power. It is the largest middle power in the system, and increasingly a potential great power. By the end of this decade, it is on track to become the world’s third-largest economy.

But there is a catch, and it is not a small one.

India’s per capita income remains roughly $2,900 — ranking 141st globally. The country’s aggregate strength sits in stark contrast to the lived economic reality of its 1.5 billion citizens. India’s rise is real, but it is uneven. Its size gives it global salience; its internal development gaps impose restraint.

The strategic question for New Delhi is not whether it will matter. It already does. The question is whether it can translate scale into sustained prosperity — and power — amid the intensifying rivalry between the United States and China.

The inflection point came in the early 1990s.

After decades of economic underperformance, market reforms initiated in 1991 unleashed higher growth. By the turn of the century, perceptions began to shift. “Developing India” gave way to “rising India.” The country began to speak openly of reclaiming its “natural place” at the global high table.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has set an ambitious target: achieving developed-nation status by 2047, the centennial of independence. That would require per capita income to reach roughly $12,000 to $15,000 — a formidable leap from today’s base.

The obstacles are structural. Nation-building remains incomplete. Federal politics complicate reform. Welfarism is deeply entrenched. Resistance to liberalization persists across political lines.

Yet ambition matters in international politics. Even if progress is measured, India’s trajectory is upward.

In aggregate terms — GDP, military manpower, defense spending, technological capacity — India is moving into the ranks of major powers. Some long-term projections even suggest it could overtake the United States in total GDP later this century.

But such forecasts obscure present constraints. Today, India remains a distant third behind Washington and Beijing in comprehensive national power. That gap shapes its foreign policy.

India’s great power aspirations are inseparable from its conflict with China.

Unlike most middle powers, India does not observe U.S.-China rivalry from afar. China is a neighbor. The two share a disputed border. They fought a war in 1962. They experienced major military standoffs in 2013, 2014, 2017, and most seriously in 2020 in Ladakh. Those confrontations shattered nearly two decades of border stability.

Since then, New Delhi has moved closer to Washington — not out of ideology, but necessity. The structural challenge posed by Beijing has driven a tilt toward the United States.

At the same time, India has resisted turning the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue — the Quad with the United States, Japan, and Australia — into a formal military alliance. Strategic autonomy remains central to Indian thinking.

The diplomacy with Beijing reflects this duality. Modi’s meetings with Xi Jinping in 2024 and 2025 produced agreements on troop disengagement and efforts to stabilize the border. De-escalation is incomplete, but the political signal is clear: India seeks peaceful coexistence, not permanent confrontation.

India understands a hard truth. It must live with China.

Over the past two decades, the United States has actively supported India’s rise. Washington has eased technology restrictions, strengthened defense ties, and positioned India as central to its Indo-Pacific strategy.

Under President Joe Biden, the partnership deepened further through initiatives like the Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technologies. But the return of President Donald Trump has injected volatility. Tariffs, transactional diplomacy, and an “America First” posture have shaken confidence in long-term U.S. reliability.

India has chosen caution. It has not escalated tensions with Washington, even in the face of trade friction. The stakes are too high. The structural logic of cooperation — balancing China — remains intact.

Yet suspicion of American meddling endures across India’s political spectrum. The left fears U.S. dominance. The right fears dependency or a potential U.S.-China “G2” bargain that sidelines Indian interests.

India wants partnership — not patronage.

India’s ties with Russia illustrate its hedging instinct.

Despite Western pressure after Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, India did not condemn Russia outright. It avoided sanctions violations but increased purchases of discounted Russian crude. The calculus is pragmatic. Russia remains deeply embedded in India’s military inventory. Diversification takes time.

But the relationship is no longer what it was. Moscow’s growing alignment with Beijing reduces its value as a balancer. Economically and technologically, Russia cannot compete with the West.

India’s Russia policy today can best be described as a managed decline — maintaining ties as insurance against volatility, while gradually shifting weight westward.

Attio's AI handles my morning prep — surfacing insights from calls, updating records without manual entry, and answering pipeline questions in seconds. No searching, no switching tabs, no manual updates.

Start now →

On political values, India occupies an uncomfortable space.

It is the world’s largest democracy. Yet it resists Western liberal interventionism. Criticism of democratic backsliding under Modi — on minority rights, media freedom, judicial independence — generates backlash across India’s political spectrum.

For many Indian elites, sovereignty is paramount. Western doctrines like humanitarian intervention and democracy promotion are viewed with suspicion.

Ironically, the Trump administration’s retreat from liberal internationalism may reduce friction. When Washington emphasizes interests over values, it aligns more comfortably with India’s preference for non-intervention.

But India’s instinct for sovereignty also places it closer to China and Russia on certain normative debates — even as it competes with Beijing geopolitically.

This tension is unlikely to disappear.

Technology sits at the core of India’s modern partnership with the United States.

Where technological denial once defined the relationship — particularly after India’s 1974 and 1998 nuclear tests — cooperation now drives it.

The iCET initiative reflects U.S. efforts to reconfigure supply chains away from China. For India, it offers modernization of its techno-industrial base and reduced reliance on Russian systems.

But constraints remain. U.S. export controls, visa politics, and concerns about technology leakage complicate matters. Meanwhile, China’s dominance in critical sectors — from green technologies to rare earths — creates new dependencies for India.

India seeks autonomy in technology, not substitution of one dependency for another.

On climate, India has moved from defensive posturing to pragmatic engagement.

Modi’s pledge to reach net-zero emissions by 2070 signals intent. Solar capacity has expanded rapidly. The National Green Hydrogen Mission and plans for Small Modular Reactors underscore diversification.

Yet growth remains the priority. Fossil fuels still underpin development. And China’s dominance in renewable supply chains leaves India navigating uncomfortable trade-offs.

India’s climate diplomacy increasingly balances three realities: development needs, geopolitical competition, and domestic sustainability.

India will remain a distant third behind the United States and China in comprehensive power for the foreseeable future. But its importance lies elsewhere.

In a polarized system, India is a swing state. Its choices influence the Asian balance of power. Its market matters to global supply chains. Its diplomacy shapes coalitions.

The challenge is generational. Bridging the power gap with China without provoking conflict. Leveraging U.S. partnership without surrendering autonomy. Accelerating growth while managing domestic complexity.

India’s rise is not inevitable. Nor is it linear.

But in a century defined by U.S.-China rivalry, India’s trajectory — cautious, ambitious, hedged — may prove decisive not only for its own citizens, but for the shape of the global order itself.

Interested in learning more about global economics? Check out our previous coverage here:

Because it’s how creators turn attention into an owned audience, and an audience into a real, compounding business.

The smartest creators aren’t chasing followers. They’re building lists. And they’re building them on beehiiv, where growth, monetization, and ownership are built in from day one.

If you’re serious about turning what you know into something you own, there’s no better place to start. Find out why the fastest-growing newsletters choose beehiiv.

And for a limited time, take advantage of 30% off your first 3 months with code GROW30.

Start building for 30% off today.

That’s all for this week. If you enjoyed this edition, we’d really appreciate if you shared it with a friend, family member or colleague.

We’ll be back in your inbox 2 PM IST next Sunday. Till then, have a productive week!

Peeyush and Mohit

Disclaimer: The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in the text belong solely to the author, and not necessarily to the author's employer, organization, committee or other group or individual.