The Food Delivery Duopoly Finally Has a Problem

Salutations, Olio aficionados! 👋

Welcome to the 292nd edition of Weekly Olio. We’re thrilled to introduce a fresh new twist to your Sundays: Publisher Parmesan, our hand-picked, thoughtfully crafted edition designed to spark inspiration and insights for the week ahead.

It’s the perfect way to unwind, recharge, and prepare for the week with something truly worth savoring.

If you’re new here and you’re looking for more long-form, crispy writing, click the link to subscribe under this GIF 👇

Jira Product Discovery gives teams one place to capture customer feedback, prioritize ideas with consistent frameworks, and build living roadmaps everyone can align on. And when it’s time to build, those decisions connect directly to delivery in Jira, so everyone can see how the roadmap turns into real work.

Try Jira Product Discovery

For years, India's food-delivery market looked settled.

Swiggy and Zomato had built enormous networks of restaurants, delivery partners and customers. Their scale made the marketplace difficult to attack, while commissions, advertising and delivery fees created the economics needed to make the business profitable.

Then something changed. Restaurants began looking for an escape.

The National Restaurant Association of India, representing more than 500,000 restaurants, has spent years complaining about commissions that can reach 35-40% after advertising and discounts. But the frustration became actionable when Rapido entered food delivery with an unusual proposition: zero commission for restaurants.

That sounds almost too good to be true.

Rapido is betting that it can make the model work by using its existing network of more than three million bike-taxi drivers, targeting smaller and cheaper food orders, and attracting consumers who currently don't order food online very often.

Swiggy clearly thinks the threat is worth responding to. Zomato doesn't. And that disagreement reveals the real question.

Is Rapido creating a new food-delivery market, or simply subsidizing customer acquisition with a business model that will eventually have to look a lot like the one it is trying to disrupt?

Earlier this month, a Swiggy delegation met the National Restaurant Association of India. The complaints waiting for them were familiar: commissions as high as 35-40%, promotional discounts applied without restaurant consent, unexplained deductions and account managers who seemed to disappear whenever disputes arose.

But this time the restaurant association had something new. An alternative.

Only days earlier, NRAI had signed a memorandum of understanding with Rapido's food-delivery business.

After more than a year of trying to get Swiggy and Zomato to address its concerns, the association finally had another platform willing to offer restaurants something radically different.

Zero commission.

For Swiggy, the meeting was no longer about listening to restaurant complaints. It was about preventing those restaurants from leaving.

Rapido isn't entering food delivery the way Uber did.

Uber built a dedicated two-wheeler delivery operation and eventually sold its food-delivery business to Zomato. Amazon tried food delivery in Bengaluru and shut it within two years. Even NRAI's own attempt to create a direct-payment and delivery alternative struggled because someone still had to solve the last-mile problem.

Rapido has already solved part of that problem.

The company has more than three million active bike-taxi drivers across India. Its long-term plan is to allow those drivers to perform food deliveries as well, creating a shared supply pool across two businesses.

That is an important advantage.

A food-delivery company starting from scratch needs to build a driver network before it can build order density. Rapido already has one.

And the early signals are encouraging. But drivers are only one side of the equation. The harder problem is demand.

Rapido's pitch to restaurants is extraordinarily simple. Don't pay us a commission. Instead, pass the delivery fee to the customer.

For a restaurant selling a ₹100 dish through Swiggy or Zomato, the economics can become surprisingly unattractive once commissions, advertising and discounts are included. A restaurant may effectively give up around ₹30, leaving only ₹70 before food costs, labor and overheads.

On Rapido's platform, the restaurant keeps the full ₹100. That can materially improve contribution margins.

For some restaurants, the difference is enough to make the decision obvious. But there is a catch.

The customer still has to want to order.

And Indian consumers currently order food online only around three to five times a month, compared with perhaps eight to ten times in the US.

Rapido's bet is that cheaper food can change that behavior. Instead of fighting Swiggy and Zomato for their existing customers, it wants to create new ones.

That is a much more ambitious strategy.

Found the right hire, but no entity in their country? Remote becomes the legal employer — with contracts, benefits, and tax setup handled, plus direct access to the same in-house team that runs payroll locally.

Book a free demo

The most interesting part of Rapido's strategy is not actually zero commission.

It is the customer it is targeting.

The existing food-delivery market is heavily concentrated among affluent consumers. ~95% of India's food-delivery market currently comes from the top 10% of earners.

That means the industry may have mistaken penetration among wealthy consumers for the size of the overall opportunity.

Rapido is going after households further down the income distribution.

Its target is the ₹200-and-below order.

That is important because Swiggy and Zomato have historically needed average order values of roughly ₹350-400 or more for their economics to work. Their business models depend on commissions plus delivery, handling and other fees layered onto relatively large baskets.

Rapido is essentially asking a different question.

What happens if millions of Indians who currently don't order online start ordering because the meal becomes affordable enough?

If that works, Rapido isn't stealing market share. It is expanding the market. That is the kind of disruption incumbents should actually worry about.

And yet, Zomato's response has been remarkably dismissive.

Deepinder Goyal, founder and CEO of Eternal, Zomato's parent company, has publicly described the budget food-delivery trend as an economic dead end.

His argument is straightforward.

If the same restaurants are offering similar or faster delivery at lower menu prices, while those lower prices are funded by lower commissions and delivery fees, the revenue gap becomes increasingly difficult to sustain.

In his view, nothing fundamentally new is being created. The customer is simply being attracted through price. And price-driven growth without structural economic improvement eventually resolves itself.

There is some logic to that argument.

Zomato's food-delivery business generated an adjusted EBITDA margin of around 5.5% of net order value in the quarter, while Eternal's overall profitability has been improving sharply.

Swiggy, meanwhile, has had a much harder time balancing food delivery with the enormous investment required to compete in quick commerce.

For incumbents, the lesson is obvious. Don't panic every time someone offers cheaper delivery. The real question is whether the entrant has discovered a fundamentally better cost structure.

That is where Rapido becomes interesting.

Its food-delivery business doesn't exist in isolation.

The company already has a large transportation network, and that network can potentially be shared across businesses.

A bike taxi driver who transports a passenger at 2 p.m. might deliver food at 2:30.

The incremental cost of adding that second transaction can therefore be much lower than building an entirely new delivery fleet.

This is the same basic logic that made Amazon's logistics infrastructure so powerful: fixed infrastructure becomes more valuable when it can serve multiple categories.

Rapido is attempting something similar with its driver network.

If it can combine passenger mobility with food delivery and eventually other logistics services, the economics begin to look structurally different from a standalone food-delivery company.

That is the bet. And it is also why Swiggy is paying attention.

There is already evidence that the market is becoming crowded.

Swiggy has launched its own budget-food proposition, Toing, with dishes priced as low as ₹49. Flipkart has entered food delivery with a pilot charging restaurants roughly 8-11% commission.

That creates an interesting paradox.

Rapido's biggest achievement may be forcing competition into a market where restaurants had very little negotiating power.

But the more competitors enter, the harder it becomes for any one of them to sustain unusually attractive economics.

Zero commission is a powerful customer-acquisition tool. It is not necessarily a business model.

Restaurant owners themselves seem aware of this. Some reportedly say they would be willing to pay a 5-10% commission if the platform delivered meaningful incremental demand.

That may be the eventual equilibrium. Rapido doesn't need to charge zero forever.

It simply needs to use zero to break the incumbents' hold, build enough demand and create enough network density that restaurants are willing to pay something later.

That is a very different strategy from trying to remain the cheapest platform forever.

The fascinating thing about marketplaces is that disruption almost never begins with the consumer.

It begins with someone who feels exploited by the incumbent.

In India's food-delivery market, that someone is the restaurant.

For years, Swiggy and Zomato could effectively set the rules because restaurants had nowhere else to go. The platforms controlled demand, the drivers controlled supply, and the restaurants paid for access to both.

Rapido has changed one part of that equation.

For the first time in years, restaurants have a credible alternative.

But the real test is still ahead.

Can Rapido turn three million existing mobility drivers into a structural cost advantage? Can lower prices bring millions of new consumers into online food delivery? Can it create enough order density to make ₹200 orders profitable?

If the answer is yes, India's food-delivery market may be about to expand dramatically.

If the answer is no, zero commission will eventually become what Zomato says it is: a temporary subsidy disguised as disruption.

The next few years will reveal which one it is.

Because in marketplaces, the hardest thing isn't offering customers a better deal. It's making the better deal profitable.

Missed reading the recent editions? Check out our previous coverage here:

Pioneer, the summit where CX leaders redefine what’s possible, is on October 7th.

Join leaders from Fin, Anthropic, Clay, and Kalshi for an insightful conversation on the state of AI transformation.

You’ll discover how some of the most innovative minds in CX have transformed their organizations, learn how they think about CX, and hear how they're planning for what's next.

Join the conversation in San Francisco, or tune in virtually.

Reserve your spot

That’s all for this week. If you enjoyed this edition, we’d really appreciate if you shared it with a friend, family member or colleague.

We’ll be back in your inbox 2 PM IST next Sunday. Till then, have a productive week!

Peeyush and Mohit

Disclaimer: The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in the text belong solely to the author, and not necessarily to the author's employer, organization, committee or other group or individual.